Wisdom wanted on savings

[WestSideBilly]

[Markor]

[david_mcmanus]

And we all know that liberals are never ever naive.

[Markor]

[rose-colored-coolaid]

Tim, when do we get to declare this thread a flame war?

For what it's worth, it's impossible to argue for one party or the other in the way Markor is because we have only one president every 4 years (at most). You can't make a statistical argument on a sample size of 4-5. Here's a litmus test. Do these charts help you know who you should vote for in 2016 or 2020? That's far enough in the future we can predict which parties will have a candidate (R/D) but too far to guess who the candidates will be.

[deejayoh]

RCC - you know it's not a flame war until is invoked!

that's really the only thing that keeps me reading.

[david_mcmanus]

I would also have to say that arguing on the Internet is like winning the Special Olympics. You guys get the idea....

[Markor]

[Markor]

[Alan]

[deejayoh]

[Lake Hills Renter]

Worst Economics Thread Ever.

[Markor]

It's a myth that Democrats shower the poor with money. Clinton ended welfare as we knew it. You don't get $$ for babies anymore, except temporarily.

Democrats support and work toward balanced budgets--at least the one Democratic prez we've had in the last 28 years did. So they don't steal from the future, except in the process of correcting the country-busting wealthy-engorging pork barrel expenditures of the Republicans. Clinton increased the prosperity of the rich and the poor and the middle class--every class. He did it mainly by cutting expenses and by making a myriad of other liberal (i.e. for the good of all, not just the rich) decisions.

[deejayoh]

Perhaps we need a political rant forum?

oh yeah, it's

[perfectfire]